The Trust Paradox: Why We Will Inevitably Stop Trusting Our AI Shopping Agents
Abstract
The emergence of autonomous AI purchasing agents represents a structural reconfiguration of commercial exchange that fundamentally alters the mechanisms and dynamics of consumer trust. This paper develops a predictive conceptual framework for understanding trust evolution in AI-mediated commerce, arguing that platforms deploying these agents will face powerful economic pressures to introduce monetization strategies that systematically erode the initial trust foundation. Drawing on principal-agent theory and the historical precedent of Google Search’s transformation from information utility to advertising platform, I propose that AI commerce will likely follow a similar trajectory absent deliberate countermeasures. The paper presents a three-phase trust lifecycle model: (1) utility-driven adoption, (2) monetization-induced misalignment, and (3) potential disillusionment and market bifurcation. I introduce the concept of “computational trust”—trust mechanisms emphasizing radical verifiability, systemic reliability, and algorithmic transparency—as a strategic response for organizations and policymakers seeking to prevent or mitigate trust erosion. The framework yields eleven testable propositions and provides strategic guidance for firms navigating the transition to agent-intermediated markets. This analysis contributes to marketing theory by extending principal-agent frameworks to three-party consumer-agent-platform relationships and by identifying computational trust as a distinct construct from traditional relationship-based trust mechanisms. As a conceptual framework developed prior to widespread AI agent deployment, this work generates testable propositions requiring empirical validation as the technology matures.
Keywords: trust, artificial intelligence, AI agents, agentic commerce, platform economics, principal-agent theory, algorithmic commerce, computational trust, technology acceptance, platform monetization