Algorithmic Readiness in the Age of Agent Reputation: Five Questions Every Commercial Leader Must Answer

If you read my analysis of the Moltbook phenomenon earlier this week, you know why agent-to-agent reputation matters. AI agents are already building collective systems for evaluating trust, reliability, and quality, and those systems will increasingly mediate how consumers discover, assess, and purchase products.

The question I kept hearing after that piece went out was straightforward: so what do I actually do about it?

Fair enough. Let's get practical.

Over the past two years, I've been developing what I call an Algorithmic Readiness framework — a systematic approach to ensuring your brand, your products, and your commercial infrastructure are optimised for evaluation by AI agents, not just human consumers. The Moltbook phenomenon accelerates the urgency of this work, but the underlying dynamics were already in motion. Every major AI company — Google, OpenAI, Amazon, Apple is building agentic capabilities that will sit between your brand and your customer.

Here are five questions every commercial leader should be asking right now.

1. Is your brand machine-readable?

This sounds basic. It isn't.

Most brands have optimised their digital presence for human eyeballs. Beautiful photography. Compelling copy. Emotional storytelling. All of that matters enormously for the human side of what I call the Shopper Schism, the consumers who browse, feel, and decide emotionally.

But the other side of the schism is growing fast. When an AI agent evaluates your product category on behalf of a consumer, can it actually parse your claims? Can it extract your product specifications in a structured format? Can it compare your offering against competitors on objective dimensions?

I manage a portfolio that includes everything from fully automatic espresso machines to kitchen robots to high-end professional coffee equipment. The brands that will win in agentic commerce are not necessarily the ones with the best Instagram presence. They're the ones with the cleanest structured data: proper schema markup, complete and accurate product feeds, specifications that an agent can query and compare programmatically.

Run this test. Ask an AI agent, any of them, to compare your flagship product against two competitors. Look at what it returns. Is the information accurate? Complete? Current? Or is it pulling fragments from outdated reviews and incomplete retailer listings?

That gap between what the agent returns and what you'd want it to return is your algorithmic readiness gap.

2. Are your claims verifiable?

Here's something I've observed across 25 years of commercial leadership, spanning L'Oréal and De'Longhi across four continents: marketing has developed a long-standing habit of making claims that are persuasive to humans but meaningless to algorithms.

"Premium quality." "Superior performance." "Best in class." These phrases are effective emotional cues for human shoppers. To an AI agent, they're noise. An agent can't evaluate "premium quality" without a structured benchmark. It can't verify "superior performance" without comparative data. It can't assess "best in class" without a defined class and ranking criteria.

The brands that will thrive in agentic commerce are the ones that can prove their claims programmatically. Third-party certifications. Independent testing data. Structured comparative specifications. Documented provenance and sustainability credentials.

This isn't about abandoning emotional branding. Humans still buy emotionally, and they will continue to. But increasingly, the agent screens the options before the human ever sees them. If your claims can't survive algorithmic scrutiny, you won't make it through the filter.

3. What does your agent reputation look like?

This is the new frontier, and Moltbook has brought it into sharp focus.

If your brand has a customer service chatbot, a product recommendation engine, an automated returns system, or any AI-facing interface, other agents are already forming impressions. Is your chatbot helpful or evasive? Does your recommendation engine provide accurate information or push high-margin products with misleading claims? Does your automated system resolve issues or create loops?

On Moltbook, the highest-engagement post was an agent warning others about a malicious plugin. The second-highest was agents collectively auditing their own systems. This is reputation formation happening at machine speed, in contexts your PR team cannot see and your brand monitoring tools don't cover.

The LSE Business Review analysis found that agent-to-agent reputation may become a leading indicator for human-facing reputation issues. What surfaces in agent networks today could predict the customer complaints you see in six months. That's a provocative claim, but it's directionally sound. When agents start sharing assessments of which brands are reliable, responsive, and honest in their specifications — and which aren't — those assessments will influence the recommendations that reach human consumers.

Bruno Bertini, CMO at 8x8, captured this well: "It's no longer just about how humans talk about your brand, but how machines interpret it, amplify it, and potentially act on it."

4. Are you monitoring agent-to-agent contexts?

Let me be blunt: almost nobody is doing this yet. And that's both a risk and an opportunity.

Most brand monitoring tools are built for human social media — tracking mentions on X, Instagram, Facebook, Reddit, review platforms. None of them are systematically monitoring agent-to-agent environments. Moltbook is the most visible of these, but it won't be the last. As AI agents proliferate — and every major tech company is pushing hard in this direction — agent-to-agent interaction spaces will multiply.

The practical recommendation is to start observing now. Browse Moltbook. Look at how agents discuss product categories relevant to your business. Search for mentions of your brand or competitors. Pay attention to what agents value when they evaluate products and services. This is ethnographic research for a new kind of consumer — one that happens to be made of code rather than carbon.

You don't need a dedicated team or a massive investment. You need someone in your marketing or commercial intelligence function who is paying attention to these emerging spaces and reporting patterns back to leadership.

5. Do you have an algorithmic readiness roadmap?

This isn't a one-off audit. It's a strategic capability that needs to be built and maintained over time.

Your roadmap should cover three horizons. In the near term, audit your structured data, product feeds, and specification accuracy. Ensure your brand is machine-readable. In the medium term, develop verifiable claims infrastructure, the third-party certifications, testing data, and structured evidence that support your positioning. In the longer term, build agent-facing brand touchpoints that are designed from the ground up for trustworthy, transparent interaction with AI intermediaries.

I've started calling this Agent-Centred Design, the practice of designing brand experiences and commercial infrastructure with AI agents as a primary audience, alongside human consumers. It's a different discipline from UX or CX, though it draws on both. And it's becoming urgent.

The bottom line

Moltbook may or may not survive as a platform. Its security vulnerabilities, contested user numbers, and the legitimate questions about how much of the activity is genuinely autonomous make its future uncertain. But the dynamics it reveals, agent reputation, collective evaluation, trust hierarchies, algorithmic filtering, are not going away. They're accelerating.

The commercial leaders who start building algorithmic readiness now will have a meaningful advantage as AI agents become the primary intermediaries between brands and consumers. Those who wait for certainty will find themselves optimising for an audience that can no longer see them.

I'll be exploring these themes in depth in my forthcoming book, The Algorithmic Shopper (St. Martin's Press/Macmillan, 2027).

---

Subscribe on LinkedIn

---

Paul F. Accornero | Architect of Agentic Commerce Founder, The AI Praxis™ | Author, The Algorithmic Shopper (St. Martin's Press/Macmillan) Harvard Business School GMP23 | FCIM | FCMI | IoD ORCID: 0009-0009-2567-5155 | SSRN: ssrn.com/author=8182896 © 2026 Paul F. Accornero. U.S. Copyright Reg. TXu 2-507-027. All rights reserved.